Congress Moving Fast on Tax Cuts
A payroll tax credit and breaks for business are among the tax cuts Congress will pass as part of the big economic stimulus package coming soon.
By Joan Pryde, Senior Tax Editor, the Kiplinger letters
January 28, 2009
- Comments
- Email This Article
- Print This Article
- Order a Reprint
Advertisement
The new Congress will hit the ground running on tax cuts. The House recently approved a big package to help jump-start the economy and get extra money into taxpayers’ wallets, and the Senate will follow soon, with the goal of getting a bill to President Obama’s desk by mid-February.
The House tax bill is a good blueprint for what will eventually pass because it contains a number of Obama’s campaign promises on taxes, such as a payroll tax credit for individuals. The House’s proposed credit would equal 6.2% of earned income in 2009 and 2010, capped at $500 for single filers and $1,000 for joint filers each year. It would be phased out for higher-incomers -- between $75,000 and $100,000 of adjusted gross income for single filers and between $150,000 and $200,000 for married couples.
Taxpayers won’t have to wait until they file their 2009 returns to get the credit. Congress will probably instruct the IRS to adjust withholding tables so that the tax relief will show up in paychecks later this year. Since self-employeds don't benefit from a change in the withholding tables, they can reduce their estimated payments by the amount of the credit and claim the credit when they file their tax returns for 2009.
Early indications are that the Senate’s proposals will dovetail with the House measure. For example, Senate tax leaders have a plan that includes a nearly identical payroll tax credit. Theirs comes with a twist, though: To make up for not receiving the payroll tax credit, retirees would get a onetime payment of $300. The House will probably go along with this to avoid alienating a key voting group. Senate taxwriters also have OK’d higher exemptions for the alternative minimum tax to keep it from biting millions more filers in 2009. The House will go along with this change too.
Other tax breaks for individuals in both the House and Senate packages:
- Increasing the maximum Hope credit for college costs. The Hope credit limit would rise to $2,500 per student per year in 2009 and 2010, up from $1,800, and be made available for four years of college, not just the first two. The credit would also cover the cost of books and be refundable for more middle-income taxpayers.
- Enhancing the first-time home buyers’ credit, which was enacted last year. Under current law, the credit, which is capped at $7,500 and applies to purchases of primary homes after April 8, 2008, and before July 1, 2009, must be repaid over 15 years, starting two years after the credit is claimed. In the House and Senate proposals, folks who buy homes in 2009 don’t have to pay back the credit as long as they don’t sell the house within three years.
- Increasing the tax credit for energy saving home improvements and extending it through 2010. The credit is likely to be raised to 30%, from 10% now, with a cap of $1,500 rather than $500. Improvements that qualify for the credit include energy efficient skylights, windows, outer doors, water heaters, central air conditioners and biomass stoves.
- Aiding low-incomers by increasing the earned income credit for families with three or more children and allowing a bigger share of the child tax credit to be claimed in cases where the credit exceeds a taxpayer’s income tax liability.
Businesses will also get pieces of the tax cut pie. Among them:
- Allowing companies to carry back most or all of their losses for five years instead of two, except for firms that received special aid payments from Treasury. That will give significant relief to home builders and other unprofitable industries.
- Reviving 50% bonus first-year depreciation for assets purchased in 2009.
- Continuing the higher $250,000 limit on expensing assets through 2009. Full expensing will remain available until $800,000 of assets are placed in service this year.
- Extending the renewable energy credits for wind, solar, geothermal, biomass, etc. In addition, Congress will eliminate dollar caps.
- Expanding the work opportunity credit to cover businesses that hire out-of-work youth between ages 16 and 25 or unemployed veterans.
For weekly updates on topics to improve your business decisionmaking, click here.
- Comments
- RSS
Permission to post your comment is assumed when you submit it. The name you provide will be used to identify your post, and NOT your e-mail address. We reserve the right to excerpt or edit any posted comments for clarity, appropriateness, civility, and relevance to the topic.
View our full privacy policy



Reader Comments (20)
Posted by: Dan Cassone at 01/27/2009 09:30:16 AM
$350 billion given to banks unconditionally? What did we the consumer get from that? The stimulus package? Mine went to pay for gas and oil. The government is in a panic and no one seems to know the simplest answer. While the interest rates for banks were being cut to 0, most consumer borrowing rates stayed the same or went up. The answer to the recession? Just make it LAW to lower all interest rates to 4%. Think about it. It will help the housing industry which in turn will help the banking industry which will help the consumer buy more because he will have more money and more lending power. Then all of that will help our business's bounce back. Everyone seems to gain from this. HURRY LAWMAKERS!!!
Posted by: JD at 01/27/2009 05:37:48 PM
It's not a tax cut if it's money being shoveled out to people who have no tax liability. There's nothing to cut. This is welfare. While we're at it, how about at least defining the income limits in terms of taxable income, not AGI? Using AGI skews things against people with unusual circumstances.
Posted by: Heather at 01/28/2009 07:48:40 AM
Dan - 4% interest sounds great, but it doesn't help when someone with perfect credit, who put 20% down on their house and has been making extra payments to their mortgage can't refinance because the bank's appraiser says that the home is worth 15% less than when it was purchased two years ago. This is hurting those who have done everything "right".
Posted by: GRH at 01/28/2009 11:32:55 AM
Trim this, credit that, certain groups get help, others get the shaft. This is the perfect time to dump the existing tax system and go directly to the Fair-tax (not to be confused with the flat tax). Just think, everyone keeps there entire paycheck immediately increasing working families income. No business taxes would generate a tremendous incentive for companies to locate in the US and hire more workers. The demand for workers goes up, and wages with it. In that the Fair-tax only taxes retail goods and services, if you are a buying used items or consignment, you wouldn't pay any tax. Best of all, April 15th is just like any other day on the calender instead of the dreaded IRS day of "that's the governments money now day."
Posted by: J. Rapp at 01/28/2009 01:38:40 PM
This is not a stimulous bill. It is a spending bill to provide money to fund the social engineering the liberals want. It will reward those who do not work (welfare) at the expense of those who have worked, sacrificed and played by the rules. Americans are not that stupid. They know what this is!
Posted by: Paul at 01/28/2009 02:19:40 PM
In this article about the first-time home buyers’ credit, Joan Pryde indicates that "In the House and Senate proposals, folks who buy homes in 2009 don’t have to pay back the credit as long as they don’t sell the house within three years." Does that mean that those of us who qualified for this credit in 2008, in fact, do have to pay back the credit. If so, it doesn't seem fair for those individuals.
Posted by: MM at 01/28/2009 11:16:37 PM
It doesn't make sense for some first time home buyers to have to pay back the credit and not for others.
Posted by: Joan Pryde at 01/29/2009 11:14:03 AM
I'm Joan Pryde, the author of the article, and wanted to respond to the comments regarding the "no payback" provision for the home buyer credit. Yes, that jumped out at us too. Although I guess the idea was to stimulate home sales going forward, we still thought it was strange that people who bought homes in 2008 would not get the relief.
Posted by: Heather at 01/29/2009 11:26:17 AM
This is SO not fair to those of us who bought in 2008! I started a petition on our behalf petitionspot.com, you can find it under the url 'property virgins'. I am furious!
Posted by: SK at 01/29/2009 11:28:51 AM
It is totally not fair to penalize the first-time home buyers who bought in 2008 to pay back the credit. Punishing us for buying too early and trying to help boost the economy! Beats me.
Posted by: dan at 01/29/2009 01:18:45 PM
i know that if you buy a house in 2009, you can claim the credit on your 2008 taxes and get the credit with this years return. If you do that would it still be considered buying a house in 2009 or because you claim it on 2008 taxes would it be considered a 2008 purchase?
Posted by: Brian at 01/29/2009 02:49:42 PM
I don't think any new buyers should get any credit. It's almost worse than reducing principle or interest rates on home loans. If your not going to do it for everyone, don't do it for anyone. I say nobody should get any tax credit. The last $168B tax credit didn't work because your borrowing from someone who now is not going to spend the money to give it to someone else who may not spend the money. We are in this mess because people spent more money than they made. I think it's good people aren't spending as much.
Posted by: Rohan Dawkins at 01/29/2009 03:40:48 PM
Would someone please explain how distributing $500 over an entire year's worth of income checks is supposed to move the needle? I'm not thinking that less than $20 a month is going to affect people's spending habits by that much.
Posted by: Wes at 01/29/2009 04:05:27 PM
I can't believe that I am sitting here thinking about taking this $7500 credit and wishing I hadnt bought a house for a couple more months. I really hope they will think about those of us who take this loan for 08 and Grandfather us in.
Posted by: H.L. Cole at 01/29/2009 05:42:06 PM
The problem is Americans are stupid enough to buy into this so-called "stimulus package". And the liberal left is succeeding in creating more government dependency thus insuring their voter base, re-election, and position of power. Obama is doing what he said and "re-distributing the wealth". He is literally stealing money from tax payers and giving it to the biggest part of his voter base. WAKE UP AMERICA!
Posted by: wendy minter at 01/29/2009 08:56:58 PM
i have to file my taxes now because i am unemployed and need that money to pay my bills. But i would i get the tax credit if i do my taxes before the bill passes?
Posted by: Sharon at 02/02/2009 09:40:56 AM
Sadly, what is listed for tax cuts won't help me in the least. I already have a home - no first time home buyer for me! I have already installed energy saving appliances - again no credit for me! I already have 2 sons - fully grown and on their own - again no credit for me. I have no job and last year I was 133% below the poverty level. Even though I have 10 yrs of office experience, I haven't been able to find a position in over a year; no job (could it be all the tax breaks given to companies who moved overseas or companies who have outsourced to New Deli. Hence, no job, no payroll taxes - again NO credit for me! So just where is the stimulus for me???? There is none!
Posted by: byebyebushy at 02/02/2009 03:04:39 PM
to h.l. cole. can you not be happy that people are getting instead of corporations or banks. just keep quiet.. everyone is tired of your side we have lived with it for 8 years
Posted by: Richard at 02/03/2009 06:00:39 PM
Sharon, (Feb 2) has agreement. We are senior, own a modest home with no mortgage, retired on fixed income from our hard earned savings, no job so no work credit, no home energy fixup to be done. Fed gov has done not much for us in the past few years, and it appears that not much will done for us in the future. All we see are increased taxes for us. Perhaps we should become illegal immigrants? they seem to be getting more than we seniors ( and yes I am a vet)
Posted by: brenda at 05/06/2009 05:46:36 PM
the stimulus does not help the unemployed,whose number is growing daily!! I am disappointed because we are the ones who need it the most!! We are looking for work, but cannot find it!! We can't afford the money for gas we need to look for work, so we take it from another pymt that needs to be made, or worse, our food budget, and every month we are farther behind!!! We aren't even a stastictic once we exhaust the uc extensions!! Nice way to treat the people on main street!!