Fund Watch
Buy Load Funds Without the Load
A new Web site, InvestForLess, lets you skip the sales charge on funds, for a reasonable annual fee.
By Elizabeth Ody, Associate Editor, Kiplinger's Personal Finance
March 16, 2010
Editor's note: This story has been updated from an earlier version to reflect recent developments.
Score one for investors.
If you ever thought about investing in a terrific fund but didn’t to avoid paying a fat sales charge, you will rejoice at the arrival of a new service that takes the “load” out of load fund. A Web site called InvestForLess allows investors to buy load funds without paying a commission.
InvestForLess is sort of like the Costco of mutual funds. It charges $250 per year for membership in its platform. Once you join, you can buy the “adviser” or “institutional” share classes of funds on its platform for free. This is possible because InvestForLess, despite looking and smelling like a broker, is structured as a registered investment adviser, with Trade-PMR, a broker-dealer, as its custodian. So InvestForLess members will have access to the same share classes that are available to other advisers on the Trade-PMR network. (That InvestForLess has a custodian should also provide some comfort to any investors wary of sending money to a new outfit. As custodian, Trade-PMR takes possession of client assets, facilitates trades and sends out clients’ monthly account statements. By contrast, convicted swindler Bernard Madoff had no custodian and mailed client statements out from his own office).
Sounds peachy, but interested investors should wait for InvestForLess to work out some kinks in its business model before cutting a check. Its relationship with Trade-PMR is so new that a full list of fund offerings isn’t yet available on its site, and the site has yet to start opening new memberships through Trade-PMR.
Web site logistics aren’t the only hurdles InvestForLess has had to navigate. Its business model is controversial, to say the least, as it drastically undercuts all the brokers and advisers who pocket sales commissions, which typically run as high as 5.75% for stock funds.
InvestForLess had originally launched earlier this year on Charles Schwab & Co.’s custodian network, only to be told a few weeks into its existence that Schwab was pulling the plug on the relationship. InvestForLess then turned to Scottrade to fill Schwab’s place as custodian. But after initially giving the thumbs-up, Scottrade pulled a similar flip-flop. Schwab and Scottrade collect sales fees on any load funds purchased directly through their own brokerage platforms. Schwab also serves as the custodian for about 6,000 advisers, many of whom rely on mutual fund commissions as part of their compensation.
Kevin Knull, InvestForLess’s founder, hopes that the site’s troubles are over so that he can get on with his core mission: saving people money on their investments. It’s a cause close to his heart. For nearly a decade, Knull was a top wholesaler for Hartford Financial -- that is, he sold Hartford’s funds, annuities and other investments to advisers and brokers. He says he left feeling disgusted by the high fees pervasive through the industry.
But his wish for smooth-sailing may yet be a dream. Two large load-fund families are reported to have said that they will prevent their funds from being offered on the InvestForLess platform.
In short, you should give InvestForLess some time before opening an account, both to make sure the new custodian sticks around and to ensure that the specific funds you want to purchase will in fact be available. It will be a clear win for investors if InvestForLess can make its business model stick, and it will be one more blow against the increasingly obsolete divide between load and no-load funds. But it hasn’t stuck yet.
Topics:
- Comments
- RSS
Permission to post your comment is assumed when you submit it. The name you provide will be used to identify your post, and NOT your e-mail address. We reserve the right to excerpt or edit any posted comments for clarity, appropriateness, civility, and relevance to the topic.
View our full privacy policy


Reader Comments (10)
Posted by: Pat White at 03/16/2010 04:14:45 PM
Awesome read and what a unique service offering. This is not to say that I am a penny pincher, but this is certainly something I'll run by my father...who happens to be an advisor!
Posted by: BOBBY at 03/18/2010 08:37:22 AM
This company appears to be no more than another middle man to get a load from you. Investors out there...simply do your homework on Kiplinger or Morningstar websites to get straight no load mutual funds directly from the no load mutual fund company...why pay someone a yearly fee where you can do this yourselves. And one mention about the advisory firms that you must be a part of to get into some mutual funds...they are no better than what you can do yourself in funds such as Fairholme, FPA Crescent Fund, Selected American Shares, Akre Focus Fund or many Fidelity Funds of your choice. These are all the very best funds available and no need to go shopping elsewhere.
Posted by: Pat White at 03/18/2010 12:07:46 PM
BOBBY, you could likely get those fund favorites you mention and pay a lesser expense ratio. You're welcome.
Posted by: BOBBY at 03/18/2010 03:37:37 PM
Pat White...if you are looking at expense ratios, you are not looking at the real picture...it is TOTAL RETURN, my friend, and expense ratios have nothing to do with fees. All of the funds I mention are perfect for every investor in any long or short term. You're welcome.
Posted by: J at 03/22/2010 06:47:18 PM
What a novel idea! I love it!
Posted by: Monu at 03/23/2010 10:14:57 AM
Fantastic option. No load funds are good and some are very good, however overall return on some load funds can be more attractive than no load funds. American Funds are always attractive but I never got into them due to front load. This may be a great option for me. Thanks. Bobby and Pat White....thanks to both of you as well for good comments.
Posted by: Pat White at 03/25/2010 02:26:53 PM
Bubby: no matter the TOTAL RETURN, InvestForLess seems to be able to make it cheaper to OWN the funds. So, the TOTAL RETURN would still be the same - provided the manager is doing well.
Posted by: Bobby at 03/29/2010 08:10:56 AM
Pat White...The funds the writer mentions in her article are load mutual funds (available)...to get cheaper at this new website...My point is...get a no load fund to do the same, and the ones that I mention are 5 star Morningstar rated. Fairholme, Selected American Shares, Akre Focus, FPA Crescent Fund and Fidelity Funds are all better options than any load mutual funds out there and have the track records to prove them (Akre is an exception, but the manager Chuck Akre was a previous 5 star manager at another no load mutual fund). Bottom line is, go with the 5 star no load mutual funds directly and skip this new investing recommendation. Stick with me kid...you will learn alot.
Posted by: Pat White at 04/13/2010 01:41:37 PM
Bubby - check the costs to own your five funds vs. the cost to own the same five funds via InvestForLess. I might learn a lot from you, but it will cost me more than doing it on my own.
Posted by: Peter Wellons at 04/21/2010 02:38:42 PM
Do you know a way to purchase TPINX (Templeton Global Bond Fund) without the 4.5% upfront fee?