Value Added

Time to Buy Stocks -- Not Sell

Despite the frightening events on Wall Street, this bear market may be over soon.

By Steven Goldberg, Contributing Columnist, Kiplinger.com

September 18, 2008
Text Size T T

Advertisement

"The time to buy is when blood is running in the streets." Baron Nathan Rothschild issued that famous dictum in the early 19th century, but it holds equally true today.

The crisis on Wall Street has caused so much panic that I think it's time to increase -- not decrease -- your allocation to stocks. All the usual caveats apply: Don't do this with money you're going to need in the next few years, and don't overdo it. But if you're a long-term stock investor, go ahead. A year or two from now, I have little doubt you'll be glad you bought during this tumultuous time.

Why? When the fear is this thick, almost everyone who is going to sell stock has already sold. Further bad news -- and I have little doubt that there will be more financial failures -- will likely push stocks down only so much further. Conversely, even a thimbleful of good news will turn sellers into buyers.

Steve Leuthold of the Leuthold Group, a Minneapolis investment-research firm, is one of canniest analysts of the stock market, which he has been studying for nearly a half century. After the Dow Jones industrial average plunged 449 points September 17, he issued the following advice to clients:

"This is no time to be joining the overwhelmingly frightened investor crowd. At minimum, the market looks to be on the verge of a major rally even if it's only a snapback bear-market rally. Even though you believe the market is ultimately headed much lower (we don't), this is absolutely the wrong time to sell stocks."

Leuthold isn't basing his recommendation on gut instinct. He and his colleagues study hundreds of market and economic indicators. Their record of calling market turns is terrific. Among those he nailed almost to the day where the start of this bear market almost a year ago, and the start of the previous bull market five years earlier.

Leuthold's signals have been flashing positive (obviously wrongly) off and on for much of the summer. But as the market has fallen sharply this week, his models have turned much more positive -- particularly those indicators that measure investors' emotions.

"It's been almost 21 years since the current level of fear has prevailed in U.S. financial markets," Leuthold writes. That was right after the 1987 crash when stocks plummeted 23% in one day. What's more, in the 45-year history of his model measuring investor sentiment, the current readings are "the most bullish ever."

His model measures emotions related to short selling, options activity, mutual-fund selling and a host of other data points. They are screamingly bullish because investors are so frightened.

Is there reason to be frightened? Of course. Major financial institutions are failing right and left. The Federal Reserve and the Treasury remind me of the legend of the little boy who prevented Holland from flooding by sticking his fingers in the dikes. You fear the government will run out of fingers -- or, in this instance, the trust of the world's investors.

Housing prices, meanwhile, continue to tumble -- meaning the underlying value of all that toxic mortgage debt continues to erode. It's hard to see the economy bottoming before the housing market does.

But, remember, the stock market is a discounting mechanism. I think that most of the current and future economic woes are already reflected in stock prices. Indeed, the stock market generally turns up about six months before the economy does.

Despite the current crisis, I don't believe we're headed for anything like the Great Depression. For one thing, the Fed and the Treasury are squarely facing up to our problems. Unlike the case in Japan in the 1980s, no "zombie banks" are being allowed to stay afloat for years and years, bankrupt in everything but name. Instead, we are quickly taking down the weak institutions that are overwhelmed with subprime collateralized-debt obligations and other bad paper.

From its high October 9 of last year, Standard & Poor's 500-stock index has fallen 26% through Sept. 17. I know that's bad -- I'm an investor, too. My holdings are hardly soaring. But in the average bear market since 1945, the S&P 500 has fallen 32%. We're not far from that level now. Might the market fall 35%? Sure. But I believe we're closer to the bottom than most people think.

Sam Stovall, chief investment strategist at Standard & Poor's agrees. "We believe that from a technical perspective the bottom will likely occur on or above the 1060 level, which would equal the average bear market decline of 32%," he wrote in a note issued after the market closed September 17, with the S&P 500 at 1156. What's more, he says the market will finish the year 8% higher than the September 17 close.

That's not all. Once a bear market ends, the stock market tends to rise sharply. On average, stocks surge 38% in the 12 months after a bear market trough.

Says Leuthold: "Traders should be buying stocks, futures and ETFs now. Long term investors should use this current opportunity for selective buying, including some financials When your emotions say sell, sell, sell ... don't."

Steven T. Goldberg (bio) is an investment adviser and freelance writer.

Topics:

Discuss

Reader Comments (9)

Posted by: Chris at 09/18/2008 03:43:24 PM

AMEN!

Posted by: Nick at 09/19/2008 01:33:42 AM

even though i am not buying right now i am standing and have not sold a dime of anything these are the kind of articles we need for our emotions in these times thanks alot

Posted by: KAT at 09/20/2008 09:33:29 AM

What a great article! I am standing with my holdings, no use selling now, I agree. But why aren't these sentiments picked up and circulated as front page news? More people need to read this. We need more of the same to be published.

Posted by: Ken at 09/22/2008 04:49:38 PM

I agree with Steven Goldberg, Steve Leuthold and Sam Stovall. Now is certainly not the time to sell! And one way to make sure you don't buy-in "too earl"y is to dollar cost average into the market over the next year. I doubt you will ever regret it.

Posted by: monkeyfurball at 09/22/2008 11:50:09 PM

Good advice. I have averaged down in many of my stocks the past 8 months. Some were down 40% and I doubled the number of shares I owned. Was that hard? Of course it is. I have added to my index funds on any large down days also. Now is the time to be buying. Record highs in the DOW are the time to be selling. Always remember that.

Posted by: Ellie at 09/24/2008 12:26:16 AM

Thank goodness for this calming, concise advice from Steven (Goldberg). Now I would love to buy a stock that will go back up and make money!!!

Posted by: Moneymoe at 09/25/2008 12:48:28 AM

Steven Goldberg has written a very timely article...The market is down and going down everyday and nobody knows when this market will make a U-turn. The recent intervention by the Fedreal Government may bring some stability to the market. So if we invest in stock market today, we will reap the benefits six to nine months from now.

Posted by: Robin at 11/25/2008 11:51:55 PM

Ugh...I don't even want to mention how much money I've lost this year. However, that's part of long term investing, isn't it? My friends thought I was nuts when I told them I wanted to buy more. Why shouldn't I? Everything is low right now. Am I missing something to think this way?

Posted by: Dave at 01/09/2009 09:34:54 PM

This is yet another article (written in Sep 2008) attempting to compare this bear market to an average bear market. This is not an average bear market! Compare this to the 2000-2002 bear market. That was mainly just the tech bubble bursting, whereas this current bear is hitting everywhere. The top to bottom in the 2000 bear was 1527 for top and 777 for bottom for the S&P 500 index (about a 48% loss). So, thinking that a 26% loss is near the bottom does not make sense to me. I would estimate (and this is just a guess) that if the market went down 48% from Mar 2000 to Oct 2002, then this current bear will see more like a 60% or more drop. A 60% drop would take us from Oct 2007 high of 1565 down to 626. We did drop about 52% in Nov 2008 when we got down to about S&P 750. For long term investors (7-10 years or more), I can't argue with buying stock funds now since we are at S&P 890. But, for anybody else, I think we will fall further in 2009, so there is nothing wrong with waiting for at least some positive information before going back in. I have sold zero stock as I don't want to lock in big losses and I am too chicken to try to short the market, but I will not buy any stocks until I see the S&P get down near/below 700. If I end up completely wrong, then my existing stock funds will be in on the recovery, and I will miss any gains I could be making with new money. But, I don't think it is worth throwing more money in at this point since we have not reached 60% down. Good luck to all. And, don't make rash decisions.

Today's Video More Videos >>

Turning Allowances Into Savings

E-mail Alerts: Select the Kiplinger columns and topics to be delivered to your inbox:

Advertisement