Making Your Money Last

Make the Most of Social Security

Couples can maximize benefits if the wife collects early and the husband delays.

By Kathryn A. Walson, Staff Writer, Kiplinger's Retirement Report

October 2, 2007
Text Size T T

Advertisement

As married couples enter their sixties, they face an important, and difficult, decision: when to start collecting Social Security. Logically, husbands should start taking benefits early while their wives should claim higher benefits later. Because women tend to live longer than men, the presumption is that women are more likely to reach the “break-even age” -- when the total value of those higher benefits exceeds the total value of lower early-retirement benefits.

But a new study tosses that logic on its head. Married women generally are better off claiming benefits at the early-retirement age of 62, while their husbands generally should wait until 69, according to Boston College's Center for Retirement Research. The study was conducted by center director Alicia Munnell and senior research associate Mauricio Soto.

RELATED LINKS
A Rundown of Social Security Benefits
Social Security for the Divorced and Widowed
Both Spouses Can Get Social Security Benefits

The authors set out to determine how married couples can collect the most benefits during their years together and the rest of the surviving spouse's life. A married woman can collect Social Security based on her own earnings starting at 62, or she can claim "spousal" benefits based on her husband's earnings. A spousal benefit is equal to 50% of the husband's benefit. In either case, her benefits will be reduced if she claims before she reaches full retirement age, but her decision will not affect her survivor benefits, which she can receive after her husband dies.

A key to maximizing a couple's benefits is to increase the value of the survivor benefit, the study found. The surviving spouse is eligible to receive 100% of the higher-earning spouse's benefits. If a husband collects at 62, his benefits, and his wife's survivor benefit, will be reduced by 25%. If he waits until his full retirement age of 66, his widow will get his full benefit. Each year he delays, until age 70, boosts his benefit, and the survivor benefit, by 8%.

If her benefits are cut, why would a wife claim early? For a married woman, her reduced benefit is only temporary, say the authors. By collecting early, she increases the household income and then qualifies for a higher survivor benefit.

Coordinate Your Start Dates

The authors calculated the optimal ages to claim benefits based on various age differences and relative earnings. If the wife's earnings produce a benefit that's 40% or more of her husband's, she should claim at 62 -- because her own benefit is relatively high. He should claim at 69 to maximize the survivor benefit.

If a woman's relative earnings are equal to 30% to 40% of her husband's benefits, the couple's decision is based in part on their age difference. If they're the same age, the husband should hold off until 67 and the wife should wait until 66. The couple will spend most of the retirement period together, during which they'll be enjoying 100% of both his and her benefits. If the wife is three to six years younger, she should take her benefits at 62 and he should claim at 69 to maximize survivor benefits.

Finally, wives with the lowest relative earnings should collect a spousal benefit, which she can only do when her husband retires. If there's an age difference of five or six years, he should wait until 68 and she should collect at 62. If they're the same age, they should both collect at 66; the spousal benefit is less important because they’ll be spending most of their retirement together. (To see where you stand, visit the Web site of the Journal of Financial Planning at www.fpanet.org/journal to read the study.)

Despite the advantages of claiming benefits early, Munnell says that women are hurt in the long run by leaving the workforce early. Because women live longer, they typically need more money to fund their retirement. Working more years increases their earnings and 401(k) savings. She said in an interview that a husband should work until 69 and a wife should work until 66: "The couple will probably have a more secure retirement when the husband retires later and the woman retires with him."

Discuss

Reader Comments (39)

Posted by: 49forever at 10/03/2007 05:20:23 PM

Generally and statistically, the ideas seem good; however, broadbased assertions that people should work until and retire at some specific age grosses over individual differences. For example, I retired at 53, live comfortably on my savings and plan to file for SS at 70 so as to maximize the benefit for my surviving spouse, if any, who is much younger and may have a much longer benefit period. But, all of this is speculation, as who knows how the rules might get changed. Gaming the existing rules is easier than predicting the future rules or the future return on investments.

Posted by: artdo708 at 10/03/2007 07:06:03 PM

If couples have adequately prepared for retirement, (an idea that much of the Kiplinger Web site is devoted to), depending on Social Security becomes a very small part of the equation, if not totally a moot point. For me personally, the money I do or don't ever get from the government via SS payments will merely be icing on the cake. Play money. If I ever even collect it.

Posted by: Aubrey at 10/03/2007 09:57:27 PM

As a financial planner, I'm always asked the question ... my respone is to tell me when you will die, and I'll tell you the best age to start taking SS. One recent client who did not need the income; however, decided to take his at 62 and simply places all checks into an investment account (dividend reinvested) in a dollar-cost-averaging strategy. Who knows what also might/could happen if there is a change on party occupying the White House in 2009.

Posted by: Jay at 10/05/2007 05:35:01 PM

They always said that percentages lie and liars uses percentages. Same with statistics. Not one article I have read by CFP's/CFA's, or whatver, mentions the COLA (Cost of living adjustment) each year running about 2.5 to 3.3% per year. Figure the COLA into your profound equations for pay back time when retiring early. I am fully retired. I am getting back from Uncle Sam as much money as long as I can for all of the money I paid in. To me it is free money if getting paid back for what you put in is considered free -- most of us will not get back what we paid in. What's the point? One final note: if you think you can live on social security income as your sole source of income I wish you good luck.

Posted by: Fred at 10/09/2007 05:33:58 PM

Ms. Walson's helpful discussion of couples and SS contained: "Finally, wives with the lowest relative earnings should collect a spousal benefit, which she can only do when her husband retires." This has been wrong since 2000! The wife can collect spousal benefits as soon as the husband reaches full retirement age, whether or not he's receiving benefits. This correction makes early wife/late husband even more attractive. SSA has been consistently misinforming us on this point.

AUTHOR'S REPLY: Thanks, Fred, for your comment. Sounds like you are referring to the federal Senior Citizens' Freedom to Work Act of 2000. The law eliminated the Social Security earnings test for a person who reaches full retirement age. It also allows an individual to file for Social Security benefits at full retirement age and then suspend collection of those benefits in order to earn delayed retirement credits. Once the individual files for benefits, his or her spouse, who must be at least 62, can apply for a spousal benefit even though the higher-earning spouse has suspended collection. --Kathryn Walson, staff writer for Kiplinger's Retirement Report

Posted by: El Gordo at 10/10/2007 12:07:14 AM

Comment to Jay: I surely hope that nobody reading Kiplinger's is counting on SS benefits alone to fund their retirement years! On the other hand, if you have been investing and taking into account the longer term effect of fees, little increments can make a large long-term gain... so it pays to consider the benefits of small changes in when one begins to take SS payments.

Posted by: Shannon at 10/15/2007 09:26:31 AM

Some women I work with started collecting Social Security at 62 and are still working full-time. Is this a plus or minus? They are both 68 years.

Posted by: Suzi at 10/15/2007 12:47:08 PM

I really don't have a comment, rather a question. I am currently drawing Social Security based on my own earnings. If my spouse passes away, can I change over and receive his benefit which is much higher than my own?

Posted by: Pete Fahy at 10/15/2007 02:40:07 PM

I currently do not pay into social security at this time because I am in the PERS(Public employees retirement system) with the state of California. My spouse works for the state of California and does pay into SS. I did work previously and have 40 quarters accumulated before becoming a firefighter.Should she collect SS at 62 or wait until the maximum age? Just would like an opinion. Thanks Pete Fahy

Posted by: Carol at 10/18/2007 11:15:29 AM

I am 5 years older than my husband...I am now 64; he is yet to reach 60. All my friends are collecting their SS benefits..my question is should I wait to collect till 66? My husband feels I should wait for the maximum as it is savings for when he retires and we no longer have an incoming salary. Thank you.

Posted by: Kathryn Walson at 10/19/2007 01:35:04 PM

Thanks for all your questions/comments. For specific information, visit the Social Security Administration's Web site (www.socialsecurity.gov). You can estimate your potential benefit amounts with the retirement calculator. In the center part of the main page, under "Retirement," click on "Calculate Your Benefits." Or, if you want to talk to a live person about your options, contact your local Social Security office. To find your local office, look on the left side of the main page, under "What You Can Do Online." Click on "Find a Social Security Office," and enter your zip code. If you'd like input from other Kiplinger readers, you might also try posting a comment in our Retirement forum. -- Kathryn Walson, Kiplinger's Retirement Report

Posted by: Ramona Rey-Murphy at 10/22/2007 05:04:12 PM

I earn three times what my husband earns and am two years older, currently 57 and 55, respectively. Because his job is physically demanding I don't know how long he will work. Who should claim first, and when?

Posted by: bill farley at 10/26/2007 10:42:46 AM

The impact of the Windfall Elimination Provision (WEP) would seem to affect the payout and payout dates.

Posted by: Bruce Rogers at 11/13/2007 04:43:35 PM

The article addresses several situations except mine. That is, my wife is older than I am by 4 years; I'm 60 now and my wife will be 65 in April 08. So in this instance, who should take benefits first, and when. Her benefits are about 40% of mine.

Posted by: Bill Hazlett at 11/23/2007 05:32:13 PM

My wife is 3 1/2 years older than I. Can she start to draw benefits at 62 or will she have to wait until I am at retirement age. She did work a few years of our marriage long ago.

Posted by: Jamie at 01/17/2008 10:14:56 AM

What if the wife is the bread winner and makes more than her husband? How does this affect your calculations?

Posted by: Nancy Frydrych at 01/21/2008 09:42:22 AM

My husband and I are the same age. Here is the kicker in all this. He was forced to retire on Social Security disability. How will this affect our benefits if I should decide to retire at 62?

Posted by: Richard at 02/03/2008 05:55:57 PM

My lady is 10 years older then me and turns 62 this year. I am the primary wage earner. Should we get married before she is 62 so she can collect SS benefits? or does it matter if we wait and get married after she is 62? is there any complications with waiting? if so what are they? Any coaching you can provide will be useful and appreciated thank you.

Posted by: geri at 05/04/2008 10:52:23 AM

I will be 62 next July. My husband passed away in 2005 and because I was working full time, I was not able to get widow's SS. I want to continue working until age 70 (God willing) and collect my SS at age 62. I have a house payment that get paid out of my pension from my previous employer. However, that pension is running out. I don't make enough money to at my present job to make my house payment so this is why I want to start collecting my SS at age 62. Can I collect full SS and still work full time?

Posted by: Kathryn Walson at 05/07/2008 01:03:22 PM

Hi, I'm Katie Walson, the author of this article. Thank you for your question, Geri. If you are working full time, the Social Security benefits that you collect based on your own earnings will be subject to the earnings limit. You will lose $1 in benefits for every $2 in income above the earnings limit, which is $13,540 this year. The earnings limit is lifted once you reach your full retirement age of 66. Also, if you start collecting benefits at age 62, your benefits will be permanently reduced by 25%. The earnings test also applies if you opt to collect a survivor benefit, which is 100% of your late husband’s benefit. Hope that helps! You can visit your local Social Security office for more information about your benefits.

Posted by: Fritz at 05/20/2008 03:10:51 PM

I am taking advantage of the program offered by the Social Security Administration to withdraw my original application and repay all my benefits (Form 521, Request for Withdrawal Claim). I have purchased life insurance to cover the amount I am repaying. I plan to reapply at my current age (69 1/2). My wife started drawing Social Security benefits at age 62 with a small part of her benefits coming from my account, which we will also repay. She is now age 69. If my wife's benefit remains the same, it will be approximately 27% of my new benefit. What should we do to increase my wife's benefit to 50% of my new benefit?

Posted by: Advice needed at 06/02/2008 03:30:00 PM

My husband is 62. I will be 62 in a few weeks. He plans to not collect until eligible for full retirement. I have worked off and on over the years, and qualify for my own social security, but a much smaller amount than if I just "used his". A friend told me that she is in the same boat, but has started taking her own social security, with the plan to use his later, when she can. Is this possible?

Posted by: Kathryn Walson at 06/05/2008 02:41:30 PM

This is Kathryn Walson, the story's author. Thanks for your question, Fritz. Because your wife started drawing Social Security at age 62 instead of her full retirement age, her own benefit is permanently reduced--for example, $391 per month instead of $500. Say your new monthly payout, after you re-apply, is $1,200. Because your wife's spousal benefit is based on her maximum possible benefit of $500, the most she could receive from your benefit is $100. So, with her reduced benefit, she'd receive a monthly total of $491. For your wife to boost her payout to half of yours--$600 in this example--she'll need to withdraw her own application, repay all her benefits and re-apply.

Posted by: Kathryn Walson at 06/20/2008 02:53:59 PM

This is Kathryn Walson, the story's author, responding to the question posed by "Advice needed" on June 2. Yes, you can collect your Social Security benefit based on your own earnings and later based on your spouse’s earnings. Let's say you’re currently eligible to receive $400 based on your earnings, but you'll be eligible for a $600 spousal benefit once your spouse starts collecting his full benefit. At that time, you would receive an additional $200 to account for the difference. For more information or to use the Social Security Administration's retirement calculator, visitwww.socialsecurity.gov.

Posted by: Robert at 06/30/2008 04:55:04 PM

I'm 64 my wife is 61 will be 62 next April. We both are on SS disability. My wife gets a very small amount. When she reaches 62 can she start to collect against my SS?

Posted by: Paul Allen at 07/11/2008 03:36:09 AM

My wife is entitled to a small benefit based on her work record. My benefit will be considerably higher. She's 61, I'm 62. According to the Munnell & Soto study, we will apply for benefits when I'm 67 and she, 66. She will then qualify for the full 50% spousal payment. However, to ensure that we at least receive some benefits on her behalf in case she does not survive to 66, she plans to apply for benefits based on her work record at 62. Then, to avoid the permanent benefit reduction from her early application, she will repay the benefits received at 66 and then reapply so as to qualify for the full 50% spousal payment. Is this wise?

Posted by: Katie Walson at 07/28/2008 12:31:56 PM

For Paul Allen: This is Katherine Walson again, author of the article. Mr. Allen, that approach is fine, assuming your wife's spousal payment is larger than what she is due based on her own work record. Your wife may opt for reduced retirement benefits at age 62 and then, at full retirement age, file for a "withdrawal of application" and pay back her benefits. She could then file for a spouse's benefit on your record and receive the full spousal benefit.

Posted by: Kathryn Walson at 07/28/2008 06:56:05 PM

This is in response to Robert's question from June 30. Robert, Assuming that your wife's monthly benefit as a spouse would be greater than what she currently receives, she could file for spouse’s benefits on your Social Security record at age 62. Your wife also has the option of waiting until her full retirement age and filing for an unreduced spouse's benefit.

Posted by: Tom McCrary at 08/02/2008 01:39:37 PM

My wife has 22 credits toward the 40 needed to get benefits. She currently does not work. Should she start working to earn the 40 credits, or should we just focus her getting my benefits?

Posted by: Andi at 08/16/2008 10:50:51 PM

My father passed away in July. Both my parents worked. My father's monthly payment was larger than my Mom's. She received her death benefit $255--but was told that she would continue to receive HER payment, and that she could not receive HIS instead. I thought the surviving spouse was awarded the higher benefit upon death?

Posted by: Blane Briggs at 10/07/2008 07:00:58 PM

I'd like to know more for men in my situation. I'm near 60 and my wife just turned 38. Whats the best course for me and can she draw survivors benefits before age 62 if i die?

Posted by: elizabeth M. at 01/18/2009 09:54:08 PM

How about the same information as it applies to single adults?

Posted by: Paul at 03/17/2009 09:06:52 PM

My wife and I both filed at 62 and still work parttime. We also cashed out our IRAs and paid the taxes to keep from being forced to withdraw at 72, as our government decrees. Paid off all current bills, only have the pre-arranged funeral expenses we are paying on now, about $10,000 each. We figured when they fix Social Security, the 62 may become 65 or 68 like they did with 65 to 66. Or worse. A bird in the hand is better than 40 in the bush.

Posted by: Kim Kimball at 03/25/2009 09:53:49 AM

First of all there is no such thing as "Full Retirement" Real full retirement is whatever amount you get from SS that allows you to retire as early as possible. That could be anywhare from 62 to 70. What you need to do is caculate what you need and don't worry about wheather you collect at 62 , 63 or whatever.

Posted by: Robyn at 06/23/2009 01:56:09 PM

What about when the woman is the higher earner? In all these sites that talk about these scenarios, then never address this. Also, what about taxes? If the lower-earning spouse starts collecting at 62, won't the benefit be taxes, based on the higher-earning spouse's income?

Posted by: Donna H at 06/29/2009 02:53:01 PM

My husband has retired at 66 and is now receiving his Social Security benefit. I am 3 yrs younger and the higher earner. When I reach 65, can I file for spousal benefits, continue working until age 70, and then file for my higher social security benefit?

Posted by: Marie Christiansen at 08/20/2009 11:32:11 PM

My siter is older then her husband. She started collecting at 62. Her husband has been laid off, he is 60 and can't get a job. Is he eligible to collect spousal benefits on is wifes social security?

Posted by: Chris at 10/01/2009 11:52:22 AM

My husband has retired at 66 and is now receiving his social security benefit. I am 5 years younger, when I reach 62 can I file only for spousal benefits and then file at 70 for my higher benefit?

Posted by: dale ondersma at 11/10/2009 01:54:45 PM

I really don't have a comment, rather a question. I am currently drawing Social Security based on my own earnings. If my spouse passes away, can I change over and receive his benefit which is much higher than my own?

Today's Video More Videos >>

Extra Cash for the Holidays

E-mail Alerts: Select the Kiplinger columns and topics to be delivered to your inbox:

Advertisement