Give a Gift

Credit & Money Management

6 Ways Financial Reform Will Change
Your Personal Finances

New rules will affect everything from credit scores and student loans to whether you use credit or debit cards to pay for your morning cup of coffee.

By Anne Kates Smith, Senior Associate Editor, Kiplinger's Personal Finance

July 22, 2010
Text Size T T
  • Comments
  • Print This Article
  • Order a Reprint
  • Advertisement

After months of bitter debate and a Congressional all-nighter to hammer out a final agreement, President Obama signed legislation that overhauls financial regulation. Here's how the measure will affect your family finances in ways big and small.

A new consumer watchdog will be looking out for you. The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) will regulate financial products and services, including mortgages, credit cards, student loans and debt collection. It may sound like just another government bureaucracy. But an agency focused on consumers is a big deal because existing financial regulators, scattered among a half-dozen agencies, have traditionally been focused more on the institutions they regulate than on the well-being of their customers.

Related Links


Although housed within the Federal Reserve, the new bureau will be largely independent, with a dedicated budget and a director appointed by the President and confirmed by the Senate. But the Financial Stability Oversight Council -- the collection of regulators charged with heading off risks to the financial system as a whole -- gets to override CFPB rule-making. And lending by car dealers won a controversial exemption from oversight.

The new law also aims to make us savvier -- or at least to let us sound off when we’ve been scammed. It creates a new Office of Financial Literacy within the CFPB, with a toll-free hotline for consumer complaints.

You'll get more mortgage protections. In the old days, it was in the lender’s interest to make sure you could afford a mortgage. This legislation aims to permanently restore a vested interest, along the entire chain of mortgage brokers, loan originators and borrowers, in making sure the mortgage you get is the right one. (Conspicuously absent from the legislation is any resolution of the troubles at Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, the secondary mortgage market behemoths that buy loans and repackage them to investors.)

The bill requires that lenders verify the income and assets of borrowers. It prohibits financial incentives for steering borrowers into more-expensive loans, and it bans prepayment penalties on all but the most basic, plain-vanilla mortgages. Even then, the penalties are limited in scope, and if you’re offered a loan with a prepayment penalty, you must also be offered an alternative without one (such penalties often trapped borrowers in unaffordable loans). If you choose a variable-rate loan, your lender must tell you the maximum you could end up paying. Riskier loans aren’t banned outright -- but lenders selling them off to investors must have “skin in the game,” in the form of a 5% ownership stake.

Within 90 days, the Dodd-Frank bill requires interim home-appraisal rules that will ensure appraiser independence while ironing out some of the snafus that have foiled sales under the current guidelines; an in-depth study of appraisal issues is due within a year. Also due within a year: a study of reverse-mortgage loans to determine whether stronger consumer protections, such as suitability standards, are necessary.

You will be able to access your credit score for free. Most folks know they can monitor their credit report by ordering one each year from the three big credit bureaus at AnnualCreditReport.com. And you’re entitled to a copy if you’ve been declined credit or been turned down for a job or for housing. The Dodd-Frank bill gives consumers access to their credit score if it negatively affects them in a financial transaction or hiring decision.

Maintaining your financial reputation is akin to running a race: The credit report gives you data points along the route but the score tells you how close you are to the finish line. The two together deliver a fuller financial picture. So, for example, if the terms of your credit-card agreements change for the worse because of your credit, you’ll get to see your score. But you don’t get a free peek unless you have a negative experience.

You may have to carry cash for small purchases like coffee. Having a $10 bill in your purse or your pocket will make more sense because merchants will be allowed to insist on a minimum purchase, up to $10 for now, for any payment by credit card.

Meanwhile, colleges (and federal agencies) will be allowed to set maximums for credit-card charges they accept. That could potentially limit big-ticket charges, such as tuition payments -- and the frequent-flier miles and other rewards such charges generate.

The Federal Reserve will also issue rules capping how much merchants must pay banks every time a debit card is swiped (only banks with more than $10 billion in assets would be subject to the rule and certain pre-paid cards are exempted). That could pave the way for retailers to offer discounts when you pay with a debit card -- but don’t hold your breath. Right now, merchants can offer discounts for paying cash, but few do. What we may see instead is a scaling back on debit-card rewards as banks become less inclined to lure consumers to cards that are less lucrative.

Private student loans will be reined in. Student loans that aren’t subsidized or backed by Uncle Sam have been referred to as the Wild West of student lending. Private loans often carry variable rates with no cap and lack the consumer safeguards that federal student loans provide, such as deferment options, forgiveness programs and affordable repayment plans. You can’t cancel them in the event of death or disability, and you can’t discharge them in bankruptcy.

Financial reform will bring private student loans from banks, as well as student loans from for-profit career colleges, under the oversight of the CFPB. The final bill doesn't include a proposal that would have required lenders to certify with a college that a prospective student borrower was eligible for a loan -- the intent being to give colleges the opportunity to counsel borrowers about other options.

A Private Education Loan Ombudsman within the CFPB will give students a central place to turn for help with private student loans.

Federal deposit insurance limits will get a boost. This bill makes permanent one legacy of the credit crisis that we’d like to keep: the increase in deposit insurance for banks, thrifts and credit unions to $250,000 per account, retroactive to January 1, 2008. Before the credit crisis, the limit was $100,000 per account.



DISCUSS

Permission to post your comment is assumed when you submit it. The name you provide will be used to identify your post, and NOT your e-mail address. We reserve the right to excerpt or edit any posted comments for clarity, appropriateness, civility, and relevance to the topic.
View our full privacy policy

Reader Comments (16)

Posted by: Eric at 07/02/2010 12:58:50 PM

Please do not call this the Dodd - Frank bill, it is simply saying it is a crooked - idiot bill over and over...it would be a minor miracle if it helps, simply because of the sponsors!! Better yet call it the Dodd - Frank "I'm Really Sorry - But This Is All You Get Because We're Staying In Power" Bill.

Posted by: Denny at 07/03/2010 08:19:23 PM

The Dodd-Frank Wall Street reform and consumer protection act; how scary is that? Designed by the two morons who oversaw the banking industry before wall street collapsed. God (am I allowed to say that?)help us!

Posted by: Abe at 07/03/2010 08:23:32 PM

Eric, To suggest they are sorry would require some degree of shame and we know these two characters have none of that!

Posted by: bob at 07/04/2010 08:18:35 AM

How about Fannie and Freddie, are they being "reformed" as well? What about as an elected representative to do the peoples' business you knowingly accept "incentives" from institutions not otherwise offered to the people and fail to disclose them? Are these practices being "reformed"? How about all of the existing regulatory agencies that looked the other way... while the financial system came undone, is this being addressed? What about the fact that the very people writing this legislation are joined at the hip with the institutions they are regulating and openly receive guidance and large financial contributions from the industry they are "said" to regulate, is this a good idea?

Posted by: Mary Ann at 07/05/2010 09:26:54 AM

If you didn't watch the hearings on C-Span then you have no idea the wrangling that went on just trying to get this much passed. Republicans didn't want anything done that would control lending institutions freewheeling practices that brought our country down over the past 6 or 7 years of no oversite.

Posted by: bc at 07/06/2010 11:34:07 AM

MaryAnn...Don't pin this on Republicans resisting oversight. How about the Republicans recognize Congress, particularly Dodd and Frank, have no skills, experience, common sense, or ability necessary to "protect" us as consumers. Wait and watch what happens with your credit cards...it will cost you more in the end. And mortgage protection? Good luck getting that as well. Early accounts are reporting far fewer will benefit than projected (of course). You exemplify one of our major problems; people identifying with a party and not understanding what that means or how it will result....

Posted by: Mark at 07/06/2010 11:47:26 AM

Who's paying for all this?

Posted by: Lee at 07/06/2010 01:39:05 PM

It is naive to propose that any one group does not want this bill to pass because they "didn't want anything done that would control lending institutions freewheeling practices that brought our country down over the past 6 or 7 years of no oversite." (Mary Ann, 7/5 @ 9:26am). In point of fact, and as the article clearly states in paragraph two, there are dozens of agencies that have been in place for decades that were simply not doing their jobs. Opponents suggest that instead of spending billions to create yet more bureaucratic nonsense, it would perhaps be less expensive and more expedient to either (a) dump every other agency that has failed to do this task in order to pay for it or (b) consolidate and retask some of the other agencies to get the job done (which again, they were already supposed to be doing). At the end of the day, it is this back-and-forth blame game, Republicans versus Democrats versus Independents, that has kept attention away from the real need to clean out a corrupt, unfocused, and overbearing system in order to return America from speculative panic and despair back to hope and prosperity.

Posted by: HANK TRUSHEL at 07/06/2010 01:41:26 PM

Government is getting so so big. Better get these idiots out of power when you get a chance. Should be obvious by now Obama admin has an agenda that will ruin our way of life!

Posted by: philip kowalski at 07/12/2010 09:49:49 AM

This Frank-Dodd bill in no way goes far enough but it is a start but a poor one. An issue that is not addressed is rewards on cards. How many people buy stuff and rack up credit cards just to get the freebies on the rewards for using the cards. I believe credit awareness should start from early on in life. High schools and colleges across the nation should be educating young students on credit scores, what credit is about, taxes and other financial planning. This however needs to be instituted by department of education because if more students new about finances early on the more they would not likely be in the financial fix they are today.

Posted by: amazd at 07/16/2010 09:33:37 PM

Seems like this bill will eventually cost everyone more, especially when banks pass the added charges and bureaucratic expenses on to their customers by charging for currently free checking and ATM use. How does putting an minimum or maximum charge help consumers? What this article calls lenders looking after borrowers is merely more red tape and more difficulty for people to get loans. Think about it whenever anyone says "I'm from the government and I am here to help you."

Posted by: Tony Tran at 07/17/2010 01:38:04 PM

The reform bills is not a perfect one, but, it is a start! Bankers and credit cards, mortgage companies have been abused their powers for so long. they are irresponsible in managing our monies. They are charging all the ludicrous fees such as, going to the bank to talk to the teller, interest rate are an open seasons for working people. And yet, they are charging consumer a monthly checking fee for keeping our money with NO INTEREST! This bills simply put a stop to the abusive lenders and bankers. Enough is enough!

Posted by: Caroline at 07/23/2010 09:07:37 AM

Wow this is true irony, Dodd/Frank writing this bill to fix the financial system. These two should look back at the banking crisis and housing problems and fix the problems they helped cause. What about Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac reform - this was not looked at on this bill. The true problem was unqualified people getting mortgages then packaging these loans up as "high qualit"y credit default swaps and selling these investments all over the place. What a mess - Dodd / Frank have no shame!

Posted by: Bohomme Richard at 07/28/2010 09:47:05 AM

Wow! They should all be fined for wasting the paper it's written on! Totally useless! If anything, it penalizes Joe Avg and will limit trade...didn't that old Constitution grant the Feds power to facilitate interstate trade, not impede it? Ah, BO is a constitutional lawyer, I'm sure he knows better than us! (sic)

Posted by: Jason at 07/28/2010 11:15:59 AM

Who exactly is this supposed to help? My credit card miles will go away, merchants will no longer accept credit cards without a surcharge, banks are not allowed to offer me a mortgage or student loan that has any risk even if I am willing to take that risk. I WILL have a new government agency that will be able to look at my credit, assets, debts and income. I WILL be able to take out a 72 month auto loan on a crappy Government manufactured car that will only last me 60 months. THANK YOU UNCLE SAM!!!

Posted by: Mike at 08/11/2010 04:09:59 PM

G.R.I.P. GET RID of INCUMBENT POLITICIANS. Doesnt matter what party you belong to, just do it.




Connect With Kiplinger

E-mail Updates: Select the Kiplinger columns and topics to be delivered to your inbox.

email-sign-up

Featured Videos From Kiplinger




facebook
twitter
RSS