I Beat the Credit Bureaus
I spent two frustrating years fighting to fix my credit reports.
By Jessica L. Anderson, Associate Editor
From Kiplinger's Personal Finance magazine, May 2009
- Comments
- Email This Article
- Print This Article
- Order a Reprint
Advertisement
We frequently tell you to stay on top of your credit score: Take steps to ensure it's as high as possible and take advantage of the law that allows you to get free reports once a year. So two years ago, I decided to practice what we preach.
I had always paid my bills on time and had been approved for credit cards and loans with no problem. But when I got my reports from the three major credit bureaus, two of them mentioned an unpaid balance of $38 from a water company dating back to my college days -- four years earlier -- at the University of North Carolina. I assumed there had been a mistake, and set out to correct it.
RELATED LINKS![]() | |||
![]() |
What's the Score on Your Credit? | ||
![]() |
Credit Advice You Can Trust | ||
![]() |
If I Negotiate a Payoff, Will It Hurt My Score? | ||
At first glance, the rules for fixing an error seem simple enough. But because lenders don't necessarily report to all three credit bureaus, a mistake might appear on one, two or all three of your reports, and you must dispute each one separately. Plus, challenging an error doesn't mean the credit bureau will send Sherlock Holmes to investigate. The law requires the bureaus to verify the disputed information with the data provider, but that means the credit agencies are simply validating the information they already have. "The bureau considers you to be guilty until you can prove yourself otherwise," says John Ulzheimer, president of consumer education for Credit.com.
After spending countless hours over two years trying to fix my credit, I learned a few lessons that can help should you ever be in the position of trying to correct your credit history.
Lesson #1: You're on your own. When you spot an error, the first step is to go to the source -- the lender -- to investigate. So I called the Orange Water and Sewer Authority (Owasa) in Carboro, N.C., and was told that the outstanding amount was listed as delinquent in February 2003. I had moved by then, so, I thought, it couldn't be my bill. And because it appeared to be an error, I assumed that the credit bureaus could set the record straight.
In August 2007, I submitted an online dispute with Equifax. By January -- way past the 45 days the law gives the bureau to respond to a dispute -- I hadn't heard back. So this time I called to start another challenge (no way was I risking the online process again). And I realized I had overlooked the same error on my Experian report (the Trans-Union report was clean). I tried to call Experian but got stuck in a phone tree that never offered a human voice. So I submitted an online dispute with Experian, too. The very next day, Experian sent me an e-mail saying the item had been "verified as accurate." Accurate? And the bureau found this out in less than 24 hours?
Lesson #2: Don't take the easy road. I made another round of phone calls, and a nice lady at the utility gave me more details. Owasa had never received my request to cancel serv-ice, so the company continued to issue bills in my name. In addition, Owasa was aware that new tenants had moved in and were paying the bills (apparently in my name).
So what would happen if I just paid the delinquent amount to make it go away? Both Owasa and Credit Financial Services, the collection agency my bill had been sent to, noted that it would be marked as paid. But my credit report would still show that a bill had been sent to collection. I wasn't about to pay up if it wasn't going to improve my score.
Lesson #3: Keep trying. The 45 days that Equifax had to respond to my second challenge passed. Calling back to complain wasn't even an option because the bureaus frequently change their toll-free numbers, and they typically allow only people with current reports to talk to representatives. So I purchased another report and credit score, then picked up the phone. The rep told me that Equifax had no evidence of either of my previous disputes (even though I had a confirmation number for my conversation in January). I demanded to speak with a supervisor. Amazingly, the supervisor said the disputed account could be removed in three to five days. One day later, I was notified that the account had been taken off my report. One down, one to go.
Lesson #4: Enlist help. I called some credit experts, who suggested reaching out to the North Carolina utilities commission and perhaps the state attorney general. My correspondence yielded one fact: Water and sewer authorities in North Carolina aren't governed by anyone. But the letter from the attorney general's office suggested I contact the board members of Owasa.
I ordered another round of reports and scores to use as supporting documents for my letter to the board members. The good news was that my Equifax score had bounced up nearly 80 points (to 780) since the delinquent account had been removed. I started a second protest with Experian, this time via phone, and began to gather more evidence to support my innocence.
I got a copy of my lease from the company that managed my college rental. It showed that I did not live at the address with the outstanding Owasa bill in February 2003. Finally, the proof I needed!
- Comments
- RSS
Permission to post your comment is assumed when you submit it. The name you provide will be used to identify your post, and NOT your e-mail address. We reserve the right to excerpt or edit any posted comments for clarity, appropriateness, civility, and relevance to the topic.
View our full privacy policy




Reader Comments (17)
Posted by: cnm at 04/28/2009 09:19:55 AM
Just think of all the trouble you would have saved if you had checked with the water utility after you moved, settled any final bill, and obtained a final statement showing that you owed nothing. That would have been 10 times easier than what you went through now. But of course you were a college student then, and we all know that college doesn't teach people real world common sense.
Posted by: db at 05/01/2009 02:02:02 PM
How did this article make it to print? This entire saga over $38 and come to find out the credit agencies were right! Are you kidding me! How much did all those phone calls and wasted time cost you? Here's what you do, the day your particular service (gas, water, whatever) is supposed to suspend CALL and double check and GET A NAME.
Posted by: Chuck at 05/01/2009 02:50:41 PM
This episode typifies the outrageous, draconian nature of the credit reporting industry. They hold our financial lives in their hands, yet communicating with them is virtually impossible - especially for those of us who really care about our reputations. No one should have to go through that much trouble to remove a erroneous entry nor should one incident from long ago have any impact on your rating. Not only do these agencies do a disservice to the consumers, they are just as sloppy in their reporting to the companies that want to check your credit. They do not report back two critical factors that in my humble opinion have an impact on one's credit rating: how much you earn and your net worth. Also, how well you pay your bills is only a portion of your rating. They are also concerned with the ratio of what you borrow to your borrowing capacity. Now that American Express is routinely lowering credit limits on many of their "customers", their credit scores will probably drop becaues of this. Congress is spending a lot of time on cleaning up the credit card companies. They also need to pay attention to the credit reporting industry.
Posted by: SJMinTX at 05/01/2009 03:34:04 PM
Just THINK - EVEN BETTER - IF the credit reporting agencies would ACTUALLY FOLLOW THE LETTER OF THE LAW. In my opinion, after sending Experian the necessary PROOF, if they elected to keep the item on your credit record, you had grounds for a lawsuit...By keeping clearly erroneous, derogatory information in your credit file which can harm and injure you financially and otherwise. Violation of the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) Section 607(b) concerning taking steps to assure the accuracy of the reports they provide. Violation of the FCRA Section 611 (a)(1) in that they did NOT complete the reinvestigation in a timely matter. Violation of the FCRA Section 611 (a)(2) in that they clearly did NOT provide ALL relevant information to the furnishers of the information. Violation of the FCRA Section 611 (a)(4) in that they clearly did NOT consider ALL the information your provided to them supporting your "innocence." You might also wish to contact Experian and request the details of exactly WHAT procedures and methods they used to investigate your dispute. See FCRA Section 611 (a)(7)...You might also elect to take advantage of your rights under FCRA Section 611 (b)-(d).
Posted by: Jim at 05/02/2009 08:41:54 PM
I too found a error recently, when the credit card co. closed a card I hadn't used in 6 months. I found your experience to be very similar to what I'm going through now. My rating went from 801 to 670.
Posted by: Karen at 05/03/2009 09:56:57 AM
It doesn't matter what you do. There is no way you can verify all information when moving and there always seems to be something that happens in the background that you could never know anything about. I had my life literally torn apart by some credit bureau employee who did not read their paperwork thoroughly when they entered information into a credit file they chose the wrong person. Here's what happened (it includes some of my research)--someone died with my husband's name, a wife with my name and a brother with my husband's brother's name. My husband and his credit report were dinged and his data was totally deleted and he was listed as deceased. All our loans were joint names and they had his name first so all reporting data was only on his credit reports. Why they were not included in mine is totally unknown. Try applying for a loan when your husband is dead and you are unemployed. It took us several months to get my husband back alive in the credit reporting agencies. (Involved numerous phone calls, letters, copies of obituary notices from the paper, etc.) Husband is now alive according to the credit bureaus. You think problem resolved--well think again. Lots of our credit history was totally lost because the backup system storage devices were re-written... It took three years and hours of explanation to get anyone to even talk to us abour credit cards, loans, etc. How can you get a credit bureau to admit they destroyed your life and then they won't do anything about it. We couldn't even get a car loan. All the history of previous purchases like house, cars, etc. were all gone. All we had was revolving credit information that was reported monthly. To get house loan information on the report, we had to be late with a payment. Dah, what will that accomplish. Mortgage companies are not required and will not resubmit info to a credit bureau about a previous loan obtained. Try getting a loan and institutions say we are so squeaky clean that we had to pay someone to clean up our account illegally. YOUR APPLICATION IS DENIED. Because the credit bureaus worked with us and eventually made my husband return to the living population, we have no legal recourse according to the lawyer and laws at that time. We now stay of top of things...
Posted by: dawn at 05/03/2009 10:09:23 AM
i think credit card companies and credit bureaus need investigating. i think the bureaus are unfair on how some crap gets held against us. i also had an old bill...$78.00 from att. att and i dont agree on amount owed. it is now on my report. all the rest of my credit is excellent, except that. now i cant get credit for a paper bag. dont bother looking at everything else that is always on time and always more that mim. due. NEVER been late on any! who gave them all the power to decide who get what score?...
Posted by: KG at 05/03/2009 02:24:17 PM
The Bureau's are a MONOPOLY & that is why we get no service!!! There is no excuse for taking so long on problems with todays computers. An attorney that wants to show us what they are made of needs to get on this. Bad credit can cost 100-300K easily in a persons lifetime. I know, I'm a loan/credit specialist. This problem so important it should be taught in high school.
Posted by: dp at 05/03/2009 10:13:32 PM
DO NOT contact the lender. They have six years to collect from you, and the ding will stay on your report for seven years. If you had not been able to resolve this, as will be the case with many of your dings, you will have started the six year clock all over again by the act of contacting them. Let your ego go, wait the couple of years, and let it drop-off. Also, the act of paying the ding will adversely affect your score, because it accelerates the date of your delinquency, making it, in effect, a recent default. Makes no sense, but it is the real world.
Posted by: jennifer at 05/04/2009 10:37:29 AM
Just to let people know, I thought that after 7 years any negative debts would fall off but I found out that the collection agency knows the time is getting close so they sell your debt to another agency and it becomes a new debt so it can be on there another 7 years and who knows if they can do it again. So waiting a whole 7 years didnt work too well for me.
Posted by: Bonnie at 05/04/2009 05:00:28 PM
a few years back when I was doing a refi on my home it seems somehow I ended up with 2 social security numbers and someone with the same name as myself with some bad stuff showing like jobs I had never worked at and accounts that wernt mine with deliquent stuff on them ...I joined true credit .com and for $9.95 a month I can view my report any time and they send me alerts if there are any changes in my report. I was able to straighten out my problems with my report Im sure because obviously I dont have two social security numbers ..but it took about 2 months of going back and forth to finalize all the data .. I was able to get my refi done though .. I look at my credit report every month as well to make sure everything is as it should be...
Posted by: Ryan at 05/06/2009 11:36:36 AM
Jennifer--actually, that is not true. Collection agencies may TRY to do that and TELL YOU they can...but they can't legally do this. This is called re-aging of accounts and is illegal. The 7 year time frame is based on the date that the ORIGINAL debt became delinquent. When a collection agency buys this debt or has it assigned to them, they also inherit the ORIGINAL date of first delinqueny--it makes no difference when they buy the account. Most often, however, you will have to be proactive if a collection agency tries to do this because things don't always disappear when they are legally supposed to without some prodding from you.
Posted by: Andrew Mills at 05/17/2009 03:52:11 AM
You are a fool to buy all these credit reports. What a waste of money. All lenders know that people have one or two little things on their credit reports and will typically ignore them. A score of 700 is great... no need to spend to buy credit reports. I have never bought a credit report and never will. Negotiate credit on your own terms or find another lender.
Posted by: Fred Douglas at 06/05/2009 12:54:57 PM
I am 75 and all of this is just too much. What will happen ? "Here lies Fred, who had bad credit". 3 accounts (not mine) showed up by the credit bureaus- not my cards, never seen a bill, Terrible calls. Credit bur. did not answer the phone, wrote letters, sent forms, but no help. Now I cannot even charge my drugs at Walmart. This is just the end of it.
Posted by: Rance Willey at 08/17/2009 02:05:57 AM
... The 7 year rule is from the date of last activity by the consumer. If you think that is wrong call the three major bureaus and they will verify what I am sayiing. The bureaus won't tell you but they generally drop items a few months before the 7 years is up so as to avoid any potential violations.
Posted by: Bob at 11/27/2009 04:31:27 PM
LEARN HOW THE LAW RESTORES AND PROTECTS YOUR CREDIT Section 609 of the Fair Credit Reporting Act mandates that credit bureaus must have verifiable proof documents on hand to prove what they post on your credit report. THEY DONT HAVE THEM! Without verifiable proof, derogatory information must be permanently removed! ...
Posted by: Cyb0rg at 04/13/2010 03:30:01 PM
You say the bill was 4 years old? You could have invoked the statute of limitations in NC, which is 3 years. If a bill is over 3 years old, it is removed from your credit report. I did this with almost $1000 in old medical bills and all credit agencies removed the entries within 3 days of my dispute.