"My Retirement Savings Are Gone"
The solution: Trim expenses and keep socking away cash.
By Laura Cohn, Associate Editor
From Kiplinger's Personal Finance magazine, May 2009
Advertisement
![]() |
| Douglas Paddock says spending time on his boat with his wife has changed his perspective on delaying retirement. |
Douglas Paddock always thought he'd retire at 55. But having recently reached that milestone, he has yet to put down his briefcase. Paddock changed his plans after losing a chunk of his retirement savings during the market meltdown last year. Paddock now hopes to quit his day job in three years. And a crucial part of his new plan is powering down his expectations. "Through the years, I've come to see that being satisfied in retirement means being satisfied with less," says Paddock, who lives in Wilmington, N.C.
Like many baby-boomers, Paddock, a vice-president of financial planning at BB&T bank, has delayed his retirement after watching his portfolio shrink by 30% to 40%. According to a survey by Bell Investment Advisors, of Oakland, Cal., 60% of boomer investors have put off retirement by one to four years because of the plunge in the market. To cope with the setback, 78% of those surveyed plan to cut spending as well.
SURVIVE THIS RECESSION![]() | |||
|
|
"I Lost My Job." | ||
|
|
"I Owe More Than My House Is Worth." | ||
|
|
"I'm Buried in Debt." | ||
|
|
"I Can't Get Started." | ||
RELATED EXTRAS![]() | |||
|
|
QUIZ: Test Your Recession Survival Skills | ||
|
|
COVERCAST: Survivng the Recession | ||
Cutting spending to increase savings is also part of Paddock's plan. To track expenses, he and his wife, Meyka, have started using personal-finance software. Meyka, a 48-year-old tax preparer, plans to join him in retirement in three years, and they hope the program will help them save more. Already, it has helped them cut spending in categories such as eating out and entertainment. "What's critical for us in the next three years is maximizing our savings," Paddock says.
As they clamp down on their expenses, the Paddocks will keep contributing to their retirement plans, which include 401(k)s, Roth IRAs and a SIMPLE IRA. By maintaining their contributions, the Paddocks share the approach of most investors. In an analysis of more than three million investors, the Vanguard Center for Retirement Research found that most participants in employer-based plans are still socking away money for retirement -- and investing in stocks.
Despite suffering steep losses, Paddock says, he still has faith in the market. Never a huge believer in bonds, he concedes that putting nearly all of his money in stock funds was an aggressive move. But he never thought the market would fall so far, so fast. At most, Paddock says, he thought he'd lose 20%.
As the Paddocks work to cut their spending, they face a decision about what to do with their house. In February 2007, when the stock market was still climbing, they bought a 3,000-square-foot, three-bedroom home on the North Carolina coast for $405,000. At the time, they viewed it as the perfect investment, so they put another $25,000 worth of upgrades into the place. If they could, they'd sell the house now to free up some cash. But the local real estate market is virtually frozen. And with a low, 5.5% rate on their 30-year fixed-rate mortgage, refinancing won't help. So they have to wait for buyers to come back.
Paddock says he's willing to be patient, and he's philosophical about delaying his goals. "A couple of things have changed my perspective," he says. For one thing, last year he was diagnosed with prostate cancer. That, along with the realization that he probably won't recoup the losses in his portfolio, has made him appreciate the simpler things in life. He and Meyka were inspired by new friends to buy an old 30-foot sailboat they found on Craigslist for $4,500. The boat, named "Miss M," after Meyka, provides an oasis of calm on the weekends, when they drop anchor in the local bays. "We now know we can be content with less," he says.
HERE'S HOW YOU CAN REBUILD YOUR NEST EGG
RELATED LINKS![]() | |||
|
|
Put Your 401(k) Back to Work | ||
|
|
Revive Your Retirement | ||
|
|
Your Do-It-Yourself Pension | ||
Always contribute as much as you can to your 401(k). In 2009, if you're 50 or older, you can put in $22,000. At that age you can also contribute $14,000 to a SIMPLE IRA. Particularly if you're 55 or older, don't stop funding your retirement, says Debra Neiman, a financial planner in Arlington, Mass.
If you've lost a big part of your savings, consider an annuity that guarantees minimum payouts regardless of the market's performance. You could get a 6% payout per year for the rest of your life no matter how the investment performs. If it does well, you could cash out after the surrender periodÑtypically three to seven years -- and invest it in whatever you want. But the fees for these guarantees can be steep. You can compare annuities at www.annuitygrader.com.
Finally, monitor your savings. Frank Armstrong, author of The Retirement Challenge: Will You Sink or Swim? has developed a tool to help you determine whether you'll have enough.
MORE PROFILES ON H0W TO SURVIVE THE RECESSION
"I Lost My Job."
"I Owe More Than My House Is Worth."
"I'm Buried in Debt."
"I Can't Get Started."
Listen to our Covercast: Surviving the Recession for a candid chat with our writers.




Reader Comments (15)
Posted by: Bill at 04/08/2009 12:29:51 PM
If this guy lost 40% of his portfolio then he was investing WAY too aggressively for someone on the brink of retirement....
Posted by: Truth at 04/09/2009 01:24:18 PM
...he bought a $400,000 house, owns a boat, eats out, and put most of his money in stocks, and he wants to retire early....
Posted by: VLP at 04/09/2009 03:32:10 PM
Too bad Kiplinger didn't tell us this stuff last year. Talk about closing the barn door. Of course most financial advisors have done just about the same. Best advice: Watch your own money.
Posted by: Jae Kennedy at 04/09/2009 06:38:29 PM
These stories always talk to people who are are younger or people that still have time to work to gain something back...BUT they never address the issues to the people who were retired, up in years such as my mom who is 83 and now her income is cut by 50%. What do those people do? They do not have time on their side. Who is going to bail them out?
Posted by: Bob at 04/09/2009 10:08:47 PM
I'm puzzled. If he lost 30-40%, his savings aren't gone, just diminished. As a financial person he should have known to shift away from the risky stuff as he neared retirement...A spreadsheet to keep track of savings is handy but buying personal finance software is a waste of time and money. Don't buy what you don't need, avoid debt, and shop for the best price is all anyone needs to know....Your wife can keep working for another seven years to pay for health insurance and cover expenses. You won't regret it.
Posted by: Emily Booth at 04/09/2009 11:06:38 PM
My brother and sister-in-law were laid off and went thru all of their retirement savings to keep a roof over their head, food on the table and their children in school. 100%. Not 60%. Losing 60% of your savings means you still have 40%. Not zero. Your headline is wrong.
Posted by: s2kreno at 04/10/2009 06:45:22 PM
Jae, I was frustrated too. My advisor said "invest more" but my husband is a mortgage lender and we had no more to invest. We were taking money out just as the market was at its worst. But my parents have no such problem. They took a reverse mortgage HECM and put the proceeds back in the stock market. They've already recouped the cost of the loan and their funds are recovering. And their interest rate is about 4% right now. There is a great article called "Investments Going Backwards? Put Your Mortgage in Reverse" on a site I think called guidetolenders.com or guidetolending, something like that. It might solve your problem.
Posted by: michael allen at 04/11/2009 09:35:45 AM
...He still has enough money to buy sailboat...
Posted by: Maddi Gould at 04/11/2009 12:18:50 PM
...He's got a boat. He still has his house. AND HE STILL HAS A JOB!!...
Posted by: Steve Wheelock at 04/13/2009 07:42:35 AM
This is part of the problem, the mindset that we're somehow entitled to retire in our 50s and loaf on the beach. I don't know about your parents, but my father worked until he died in his 50s, my mother worked until her Social Security kicked in, I expect to work until my late 60s or beyond (not all that far away now), even with healthy savings....
Posted by: Bob at 04/14/2009 08:19:51 AM
Well Steve, retiring in your 50s isn't about entitlement. It's about life. If your life is your work and it makes you happy, then by all means, keep working. But for many of us our job is not our identity and we work only to be able to afford the life we want. It takes a lot of discipline to plan an early retirement. Passing up the new car and buying a used one along with living in a more modest house are hard for many people to do when you are younger. I retired at 55 because I have a lot of things that I wanted to do and places I wanted to see. I wake up every morning planning what I am going to do that day. A number of my acquaintances are envious but over the years they got what they wanted when they went deep into debt to have the nicer things. They will just have to keep working to pay for it. I only have sympathy for those whose health or misfortunes have prevented them from following their own path.
Posted by: Bob at 04/15/2009 09:00:39 AM
I just noticed on my first comment to this story that the part where I advised Mr. Paddock to "sell the house,live on the boat, and go ahead and retire while his health holds up" was deleted. Why? You would be amazed at how many people live quite nicely on their boats. It's a beautiful and peaceful lifestyle.
Posted by: Ryan at 05/17/2009 09:33:49 AM
I love the part where buying the boat taught him how to appreciate the simpler things in life. Since when do you buy something to appreciate the simple things?
Posted by: Ron at 08/17/2009 03:31:40 PM
Too funny. Who are you people? That's just great that we can stick 22k in to our retirement account. But first you HAVE TO HAVE THE MONEY!!!!!!! The article depicts a VERY small percentage of boomers. The rest of us have to make it on MUCH less.
Posted by: RJF at 10/24/2009 12:18:09 PM
I retired in 2006 and have never looked back. Love it! But given a job that I love, I would continue working. Such was not my destiny. Became fed up with the whole routine of work life. I've always lived like I had less than I could afford. The downturn, yeah, it hit me but I tried to build in some float for the "stupid" unforeseables.