Life Insurance
A New Lease on Life Insurance
That term or cash-value policy you bought to protect your young family could cushion your retirement as well.
By Kimberly Lankford, Contributing Editor
From Kiplinger's Personal Finance magazine, September 2009
- Comments
- Email This Article
- Print This Article
- Order a Reprint
Advertisement
You're 53 or 56 or 61, the kids are out of the house, the mortgage is nearly paid off, and before long you'll be eligible to retire and take your pension -- and so will your better half. Life insurance? At 60, you can expect to live another 20 to 25 years, if you're in good health.
You'll have more than enough money, or at least your house will be worth a million. So surely you won't need to pay insurance premiums for much longer, right? Dropping your policy would be like getting a bonus worth hundreds or thousands of dollars a year.
Nice try. After the real estate collapse and the stock-market crash, the finances of preretirees are far more challenging. Your mortgage payments may now be more of a burden, you can't borrow against home equity, and your retirement accounts have shrunk so much that you hope to hang on to your job and continue to contribute until you're old enough to collect your full Social Security benefit. That's crucial because your pension isn't getting any bigger -- and it may in fact shrink if your company can't keep the plan solvent or the investments perform poorly.
Here's the unpleasant dilemma if you have a term-life-insurance policy that is about to expire: Renew the coverage and your premiums are almost certain to soar. Drop all coverage and your family could be in a financial bind if you die prematurely.
If you own permanent, or cash-value, life insurance, you have other decisions to make. Premiums may be level but high. You may be tempted to take out money to compensate for a smaller pension or a tighter budget, especially if you are forced into early retirement. Or you might cash it in altogether to be done with premiums. That could make sense or it could be a major financial-planning error.
Term-life policies
Millions of Americans bought low-cost, multiyear term policies ten to 20 years ago when their kids were young, and they expected to drop the coverage when the term -- and low rates -- expired. But if you go without now, you could be missing some special opportunities to extend your coverage for less than you think and retain tax-free death benefits that will make up for the damage to your retirement funds and pension.
Dane and Susan Swenson of Gainesville, Va., both 58, thought they'd be finished with life insurance by now. Dane retired from the Army in 1998 and currently works as a civilian for the U.S. Department of Defense. He has life insurance through work until he retires, which he plans to do in the next few years. He has a military pension and will qualify for a small federal-employee pension. But if he were to die and Susan collected only reduced survivor's benefits, she'd be short of money to live on.
The couple originally thought their retirement savings would allow Susan to go without life-insurance benefits. "I planned to be self-insured, but then the market dropped," says Dane. His retirement accounts fell by as much as 40%, so he started to reconsider the idea of going without insurance.
Early in 2009, Dane bought a $200,000, 15-year term policy from Genworth for $600 a year. "The policy covers the difference between being self-insured and the decrease in our portfolio," he says.
That may sound like a low price for a policy that will cover Dane until he turns 73, but it's hardly unusual. Term-insurance rates have plummeted over the past 15 years because of intense competition and longer life expectancies. So you may actually pay less now for the same coverage even though you're older, or lock in a longer rate guarantee with little impact on your premiums.
In 1994, a healthy 40-year-old man would have paid at least $995 per year for a 20-year, fixed-rate term policy with a $500,000 death benefit. Today, the same man -- now age 55 -- could buy ten more years of comparable coverage for $880 a year, as long as he's still physically fit. (In most cases you'll be asked to answer a few questions about your health, provide the insurer with doctors' references, and agree to a brief physical exam at home.)
- Comments
- RSS
Permission to post your comment is assumed when you submit it. The name you provide will be used to identify your post, and NOT your e-mail address. We reserve the right to excerpt or edit any posted comments for clarity, appropriateness, civility, and relevance to the topic.
View our full privacy policy


Reader Comments (8)
Posted by: Jorge Herrera at 08/12/2009 10:02:24 PM
Great article and very relevant to todays financial picture! There is the IBC (Infinite Banking Concept) and two main group of followers since Nelson Nash designed this unique type of policy and Pamela Yellen is taking it Nationwide. Basically we understand that the need for finance is greater than the need for insurance in our modern times and by using this very efficient process we can fund a policy and use it to finance purchase of big ticket items like our cars, vacations, school, house remodeling, etc and paying back to our policy in the same terms we would have paid the bank that give us the loan, we eliminate transfer of wealth to the banks and build a solid retirement fund while we enjoy protection for our loved ones should we die.
Posted by: Chapman Insurance at 08/12/2009 10:25:24 PM
Excellent article...
Posted by: Neil from BeamaLife at 08/13/2009 06:37:49 PM
Kim - This is a very insightful and neutral explanation of the types of life insurance policies. I agree that only term insurance is not a solution to a long range financial planning. The right combination of term and whole life is a solid long term financial strategy, as term insurance will help you to get sufficient amount of life insurance in fewer dollars while whole life will provide coverage for rest of life with option to use as a retirement supplement. The right whole life policy will allow you to spend your retirement savings for your own retirement with leaving legacy for your loved one in a form of life insurance proceed. Thanks for nice article.
Posted by: redneck at 08/13/2009 07:53:35 PM
Tis better to buy universal life then you can adjust the premiums and extent the benefit without an new policy. Level term has set premium and set years. Universal life can we set up to pay the same about as term for a small period of time and make not difference.
Posted by: Lucy at 08/14/2009 03:02:13 PM
I cannot believe you even condone anything other than term life. You know that the "benefits" that were written in the article is a bunch of bull. The previous comments are true words from a whole life agent, no surprise there.
Posted by: DVRL at 08/24/2009 12:30:33 PM
Great article and finally, unbiased. Lucy, you sound like you've been caught up by stockbroker (salesman) nonsense. How did that buy term invest the rest plan work out over the last 10 years...permanent life allows a person to live their lives to the fullest extent at least financially and not worry about market gyrations assuming a diversified strategicly allocated investment plan. The foundation of any financial plan begins and ends with life insurance, enough said. As a CFP colleague of mine says, "it isn't about the IRR, it's about not being cut in half!"
Posted by: Sharon Webster at 09/16/2009 05:18:53 PM
Companies become rich by becoming self-insured. Think about it for a second. Work hard on paying off your house and cars, and saving 2 million for retirement. Only the poor get insurance.
Posted by: Rick at 04/15/2010 06:54:05 PM
Poor article, UL does not work like this article represents. Buy term invest the rest, still is the best. If in a good balanced fund or bond fund last 10 years you would have been way ahead. UL is an ART term with a savings attached. Study how these cash value policies are built and you will find, they are term and invest the rest in a savings that has a VERY poor track record.